It was a chanel handbags for me, however. For the first time in his lengthy career, Karl Lagerfeld created a collection that completely eschewed black and navy – in fact, it eschewed color of any sort, save for a few traditional Chanel suits with a culotte twist (I just dry heaved a little bit there), which were rendered in various pastels. The collection was beautifully draped, beaded and rendered in the most unforgiving color palette you can imagine for the construction of clothing, but it all worked exactly as it should have. Of course it did; it's couture.
I'm having a vintage moment lately. Last weekend, I spent 3 hours on Friday afternoon looking for vintage art deco costume jewelry on eBay. I really want a 70s faux fur jacket. The Stephen Sprouse collection for Louis Vuitton won me over long ago. And then this morning, I was lucky enough to find the utterly charming Chanel Vintage Le Train Bag.
When there are so many chanel boots that are weathered and treated to look old when they're actually brand new, it's refreshing to look at a beautiful bag that is actually a piece of fashion history. The train illustration on this coated-canvas tote is so adorable and utterly Parisian that it serves as a wonderful reminder of not only the brand's inventiveness, but also its cultural significance.
I like this bag better than most anything I've seen from Lagerfeld & Co. lately, and I wish that more of the irreverent French influence found its way into bags like this today. I don't know that I'd be willing to pay the asking price for this piece (particularly since it's not leather), but if I had the extra money laying around, this would absolutely be at the top of my list.
Like the rest of Chanel's Spring 2010 collection, the bags that we saw walk their runway (barnway?) were more rustic-chic than classic Parisian. Whether that's your thing or not, Karl Lagerfeld certainly seems to believe in it.
The problem with Chanel, though, is that for better or for worse, they have a lot of aesthetic history to consider when a new collection is designed, and Lagerfeld usually chooses to acknowledge that
cheap chanel bags. What that means is that mostly, Chanel doesn't innovate. They do something different here and there, and a lot of their bags are quite lovely, but rarely do we see them starting new bag trends.
I don't know if that's a positive or a negative – it just sort of is. If you like their aesthetic, then I'm sure you're completely fine with what they do and how they do it. If you don't, there are plenty of alternatives on which to spend your money. There are a few unexpected things in this accessories, but mostly it's just the same bags we've seen with slightly frayed edges. I can totally understand if that's what they want to send to retail, but I also can't help but wish Lagerfeld & Co. would embrace the fantasy of the runway a little bit more in the accessories
chanel bags.This article was written by lianzongjian on 2010-2-28 from us-trade company.
I'm having a vintage moment lately. Last weekend, I spent 3 hours on Friday afternoon looking for vintage art deco costume jewelry on eBay. I really want a 70s faux fur jacket. The Stephen Sprouse collection for Louis Vuitton won me over long ago. And then this morning, I was lucky enough to find the utterly charming Chanel Vintage Le Train Bag.
When there are so many chanel boots that are weathered and treated to look old when they're actually brand new, it's refreshing to look at a beautiful bag that is actually a piece of fashion history. The train illustration on this coated-canvas tote is so adorable and utterly Parisian that it serves as a wonderful reminder of not only the brand's inventiveness, but also its cultural significance.
I like this bag better than most anything I've seen from Lagerfeld & Co. lately, and I wish that more of the irreverent French influence found its way into bags like this today. I don't know that I'd be willing to pay the asking price for this piece (particularly since it's not leather), but if I had the extra money laying around, this would absolutely be at the top of my list.
Like the rest of Chanel's Spring 2010 collection, the bags that we saw walk their runway (barnway?) were more rustic-chic than classic Parisian. Whether that's your thing or not, Karl Lagerfeld certainly seems to believe in it.
The problem with Chanel, though, is that for better or for worse, they have a lot of aesthetic history to consider when a new collection is designed, and Lagerfeld usually chooses to acknowledge that
cheap chanel bags. What that means is that mostly, Chanel doesn't innovate. They do something different here and there, and a lot of their bags are quite lovely, but rarely do we see them starting new bag trends.
I don't know if that's a positive or a negative – it just sort of is. If you like their aesthetic, then I'm sure you're completely fine with what they do and how they do it. If you don't, there are plenty of alternatives on which to spend your money. There are a few unexpected things in this accessories, but mostly it's just the same bags we've seen with slightly frayed edges. I can totally understand if that's what they want to send to retail, but I also can't help but wish Lagerfeld & Co. would embrace the fantasy of the runway a little bit more in the accessories
chanel bags.This article was written by lianzongjian on 2010-2-28 from us-trade company.